Steven Maltby receives funding from The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), The University of Newcastle and the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI). He works for the University of Newcastle and the HMRI.
Parts of the whole
Innate immunity rapidly responds to invaders; innate immunity cells deal with more than 90% of infections, removing them within hours or days. These cells recognise invaders by looking for broad shared patterns, such as common molecules on the surface of most bacteria. They might look for lipopolysaccharides (LPS), for instance, a molecule found in many bacterial cell walls.
When the innate response fails to fend off an invasion, the invaders are handled by adaptive immunity. Instead of broad patterns, each adaptive cell sees a very specific pattern. This could be one particular protein on the surface of a virus or bacteria.
But because the adaptive immune system doesn’t know what invaders it may meet, it makes millions of different cells, each of which is created to recognise a random different pattern. One adaptive cell may recognise only the flu virus, for instance, while another may recognise only a single type of bacteria.
When adaptive immune cells recognise an invader, they replicate so they form an army to kill it. This very specialised process can take a week the first time we’re infected by a new invader. If we’re exposed to a flu virus, for instance, only the small number of adaptive cells that can randomly recognise flu viruses are activated to remove infection, which is why it takes time to fight it off.
After an invader is removed, the adaptive cells that recognised it are kept, as specialised “memory cells”. If we see the same invader again, those cells can respond before we get ill. This is how the adaptive immune system learns.
The traditional understanding of the immune system was that innate immune cells couldn’t learn; that they dealt with each invader the same way every time. But new evidence suggests innate responses are changed by previous infections or vaccination, through “innate learning” or “trained immunity”.
Because innate learning changes innate immune cells, it has broad effects on how the immune system deals with infections. That means infection by one invader can cause changes in how the immune system deals with a completely different invader. In contrast, adaptive learning leads to very specific protection against repeat infection by the same invader.
Innate learning can have unexpected effects on how our immune system deals with secondary infections (infections that occur during or after a different infection). Here’s an example: the “bacille Calmette-Guerin” (BCG) vaccine is designed to protect against tuberculosis, and does a good job at protecting from tuberculosis as expected. But it also protects against infection by a completely unrelated invader, Candida albicans.
Candida albicans infection causes “candidiasis“, more commonly known as thrush or yeast infection. Studies of BCG-vaccinated patients had previously suggested that vaccination protects against infections other than tuberculosis. But how this happened wasn’t understood.
Then researchers showed protection from yeast infection happened through an improved innate response. The innate immune cells “learn” from the vaccine and protect from yeast infection for up to three months afterwards. And this is just one of a growing number of studies showing that innate immune cells can learn.
These studies extend to primitive invertebrates, including flies and mosquitoes. Invertebrates completely lack adaptive immune cells, so any immune memory responses they have are from innate learning.
In mice, herpesvirus infections can protect from completely different bacterial infections. Rather than responding the same way to every invader, innate learning changes our immune responses based on previous experiences.
Recent evidence also suggests immune learning is strongly affected by environmental factors, including diet, lifestyle, our surroundings and previous infections.
Immune responses to the yearly flu vaccine, for example, are impacted more by environmental factors than genetic differences. This suggests we can improve our immune responses by altering life experiences.
Rather that being stuck with the immune system we genetically inherit, research is showing that immune responses are shaped by life experiences. It provides hope that we can improve immunity and reduce disease through changes in lifestyle and our environment.